产品展示
  • 用解放配件平地板加宽一级脚车原厂塑料货车用品JH6汽车踏板护罩
  • ACDelco蓄电池适配进口福特锐界探险者猛禽F150原装电瓶汽车电瓶
  • 悦达起亚K3专用汽车改装内饰工作台专用配件装饰仪表台隔热避光垫
  • 铃木吉姆尼 越野全车贴 车身改装拉花 JIMNY 车门星星贴纸 装饰贴
  • 10寸圆筒双高音车载有源重低音炮12v汽车音响24v货车音箱220V蓝牙
联系方式

邮箱:admin@aa.com

电话:020-123456789

传真:020-123456789

汽车配件

Former nuclear negotiator stresses talks with N. Korea

2024-06-15 04:05:42      点击:197
Robert Gallucci,<strong></strong> a former U.S. special envoy to North Korea, speaks in the National Assembly, Monday. / Yonhap
Robert Gallucci, a former U.S. special envoy to North Korea, speaks in the National Assembly, Monday. / Yonhap

By Choi Ha-young

Robert Gallucci, the chief negotiator during the 1994 North Korean nuclear crisis, called for dialogue with the North to make a breakthrough in the crisis on the Korean Peninsula, during his speech at Seoul's National Assembly, Monday.

Gallucci, chairman of the U.S.-Korea Institute at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington, D.C., reiterated the U.S. should negotiate with Pyongyang, if there's room for improved circumstances through the negotiation.

"What we should not ask is a perfect deal. We should not ask how much does it cost," Gallucci said in an event co-hosted by Reps. Kim Kyung-hyup and Lee Tae-kyu, members of the Foreign Affairs and Unification Committee.

"We should rather ask are we better off with the deal," the former special envoy noted, referring to his past experience of talking with his North Korean counterpart Kang Sok-ju in Geneva, Switzerland.

"In 1994, our intelligence community estimated North Korea was capable to produce 200 kilograms of plutonium a year. However, when President George Bush came into office in 2001, North Korea had zero nuclear weapons," he said. "Did the North cheat us? The answer is yes. However, the deal was still a good one."

Asked about the specific benefits of beginning talks with the North, Galluci said: "The first thing that will immediately happen is that everybody will stop talking about military options and tension will go down. The second thing is that we can continue to make a case for the nuclear-free Korean peninsula. We can also talk about a peace treaty to replace the armistice."

Among the four possible measures ― military action, diplomacy, sanctions and containment ― that could be adopted to deter the North's nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles, he consistently ruled out the military option. "There's no good military option. Military options are never without cost and risk."

He asserted that sanctions are not an effective tool to bring a regime collapse. "Don't imagine that sanctions will cause so much pain that the North will abandon its nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles." Regarding containment, Gallucci pointed out that containment should be aimed at diplomacy.

Gallucci touched on the conflicting messages from the U.S. government. Earlier, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said, "We are ready to have the first meeting without precondition" during an event in Washington D.C. A few days later, however, the secretary said the North must follow a "sustained cessation of its threatening behavior."

Saying he favors the first version of the secretary, Galluci said that the U.S. government does not have a unified stance toward Pyongyang.

"I think the different messages are not planned to confuse people. I think those messages are less disciplined than previous American administrations," he said. "Officials could have different views, but it seems those views are not sorted out in an inter-agency process."


Why China can't push North Korea harder
College theatre group disqualified for saying 'bra' and 'panty' on stage