产品展示
  • 长城炮仪表台避光垫炮汽车内饰装饰用品配件中控台改装防滑防晒垫
  • 适用于07-11年款CRV车窗玻璃外压条车门防水条外切水胶条刮水亮条
  • 适用于标致小狮子打怪兽车尾标志贴301 308 408 508 打怪兽车贴
  • 适用本田15-20款思铂睿汽车后备箱改装专用隔板装饰隔板收纳配件
  • 汽车车门贴纸划痕遮挡个性创意装饰贴防水可爱情侣贴花
联系方式

邮箱:admin@aa.com

电话:020-123456789

传真:020-123456789

新闻中心

N. Korea defends military spy satellite as 'indispensable strategic option'

2024-06-06 22:08:31      点击:850

This photo, provided by North Korea's Korean Central News Agency, shows the launch of the North's new "Chollima-1" rocket, allegedly carrying a military reconnaissance satellite, "Malligyong-1," from Tongchang-ri on the North's west coast, June 1. Yonhap

A North Korean official on Tuesday called the country's military spy satellite an "indispensable strategic option" to counter the United States, which is "getting hell-bent on space militarization."

Following two botched attempts to launch the military spy satellite, named the Malligyong-1, mounted on the Chollima-1 rocket in May and August, North Korea has announced plans for a third attempt in October without specifying a specific launch date.

"The space development including military reconnaissance satellite is an indispensable strategic option for guaranteeing the security interests and right to existence of the DPRK," Ri Song-jin, a researcher of the North's National Aerospace Technology Administration, said in an English article carried by the country's official Korean Central News Agency.

DPRK refers to the acronym of the North's formal name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

Ri said North Korea will strengthen its "self-defensive capabilities" amid what the official called the "ever-escalating military threat and aggression scheme of the U.S. and its vassal forces in all areas including space."

A military spy satellite is among the high-tech weapons that the North has vowed to develop, which also include solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missiles and a nuclear-powered submarine. (Yonhap)

N. Korea put on alert against Typhoon Khanun; minor damage reported
Rising NK threats raise questions over US policy efficacy