产品展示
  • 大众途安L中央扶手箱原装一体2018途安L手扶汽车改装原厂配件19款
  • 2017-2021款大众途观L原厂款中控仪表台储物盒内饰改装配件装饰盖
  • 起亚福瑞迪汽车后备箱改装专用隔板装饰隔物板收纳配件储物盒整理
  • 现代领动扶手箱盖子加长领动汽车中央储物盒改装高配滑动伸缩配件
  • 德国正品汽车音响改装喇叭2寸高音喇叭高音头车载高音仔铝底座
联系方式

邮箱:admin@aa.com

电话:020-123456789

传真:020-123456789

汽车音响

Professor unwittingly buys back the same exact book she lost 5 years ago

2024-06-15 08:42:55      点击:989

The Circle of Life does not only apply to living things, folks.

Five years ago, Eugenia Zuroski, an associate professor of English at McMaster University in Ontario, lost her copy of Consuming Subjects: Women, Shopping and Business in the Eighteenth Centuryby Elizabeth Kowaleski-Wallace after lending it to one of her students. She'd purchased the copy in 2000, and it had traveled with her during her many moves.

After being without the book for a while, she finally ordered cheap copy on Amazon. When she opened the book and found her name and the date written in the top right-hand corner of the title page, she was shocked to find out that it was the exact same copy she had mysteriously misplaced years earlier.

Eugenia tweeted out this picture on Monday:

Mashable Top StoriesStay connected with the hottest stories of the day and the latest entertainment news.Sign up for Mashable's Top Stories newsletterBy signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.Thanks for signing up!

Eugenia recounted her disbelief to Mashable.

"I was stunned!" she said. "I put it down for a second and picked it back up to make sure I was actually seeing what I was seeing."

When asked if she thought this was some sort of cosmic sign from the universe, she replied, "I definitely thought it was uncanny, especially since the book is actually about shopping practices and how consumer markets encourage us to feel closely attached to the things we buy!"

Coincidence, serendipitous -- call it what you will. But it is definitely nothing short of incredible.

[H/T: Select All]

Diplomatic efforts on North Korea backed by military option: Tillerson
Could 2017 be the year people take universal basic income seriously?